How can we interact with a worshiper of the devatas without criticizing or approving their conceptions?
Someone worshipping a Devta and then coming to the temple – how should we respond?
There is a time when people are inquiring about something, and there are different levels of inquiry and different forums in which we can share spiritual knowledge. In general, challenging a person’s existing conceptions before they have accepted us as any kind of authority is usually counterproductive.
That authority may develop over time—through interactions where they see us as kind, thoughtful, spiritually grounded people with scriptural understanding. When they begin to respect us and what we represent, then meaningful conversations can begin.
So how do we engage initially? There is always a way to offer a non-committal acknowledgment. For instance, if someone says, “I worship a Devta,” we can respond by saying, “Oh, that’s good. Not many people today continue with traditional practices or maintain piety.” We can sincerely appreciate that they are trying to stay connected with culture and spirituality.
We don’t need to immediately point out the differences in our philosophies. If we focus only on how they are different from us, that’s all we’ll notice. But if we instead focus on the similarities, we can appreciate:
– They have some shraddha (faith),
– They are practicing traditional rituals,
– They are interested in scriptures and spirituality.
We can affirm that and then introduce what we offer: “Here we have systematic classes on the Bhagavad-gita, regular question-answer sessions, and philosophical discussions that explain the deeper meaning of the culture and practices.” This opens a path for them to take the next step forward.
We should try to build on what they already have, rather than challenge what they are doing. That’s a much more constructive and respectful approach.
Srila Prabhupada himself was very expert in this approach. When he came to India, very few Indians became his initiated disciples. One reason was that many of those who appreciated him—especially those who helped with the Juhu temple project—were already well-established in life. They were successful professionally, socially, and even spiritually—they had their own gurus and traditions.
I’ve spoken with some of Prabhupada’s disciples and senior devotees who interacted with such supporters. They noted that when they visited those life members’ homes, pictures of their previous gurus were prominently displayed—sometimes alongside Prabhupada’s. But Prabhupada never objected or criticized them for that. He focused on building relationships and engaging them in Krishna’s service.
Prabhupada would focus on his mission: spreading Krishna consciousness worldwide, teaching the soul-body distinction, and inviting people to help in that mission. Even when he visited homes where the altars had many Devtas—as is typical in many Hindu homes—Prabhupada never made an issue of it. He saw these interactions as opportunities to engage people positively.
Yes, Prabhupada could be confrontational or corrective—but only in the right setting, such as during morning walks, lectures, or when addressing devotees ready for deeper philosophical discussions. He didn’t shy away from speaking the truth; he boldly stated that Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. And his books clearly present that truth.
But our focus should not merely be: Am I telling the truth?
Rather, we should ask: How can I best help this person move forward from where they are right now?
If we develop a service attitude—not just toward Krishna, but also toward the person in front of us—then Krishna will guide us on what to say, and how to say it, to best serve them.
Does that answer your question?