What are miracles, why are they downplayed in bhakti, can they be used in bhakti?

Podcast:

What is the role of miracles in bhakti? Why are they downplayed in the bhakti tradition? And can they be used in Bhakti? These are very important questions. Let’s consider miracles from the perspective of what they are, their negative ramifications, and their positive possibilities.

In general, the word “miracle” is used for anything that is unexplainable. For example, for a child who doesn’t know chemistry, mixing two chemicals that suddenly change color dramatically might seem like a miracle. Essentially, anything unexplainable by our current knowledge or understanding is often called a miracle. In today’s world, which is largely dominated by scientific ethos, there is a considerable level of skepticism about miracles. They are often seen as unlikely or improbable, and even evidence of miracles is frequently dismissed as bad data. The principle often quoted is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Of course, there is always the possibility of people being gullible or deceived. Belief in miracles today is often considered a sign of gullibility, and skepticism is very high. Science focuses on the physical domain — what it calls “natural.” But from the perspective of Vedic ontology, there are three levels of reality: the physical, the subtle (mental or subtle material), and the spiritual. Anything beyond the physical is not explainable within the worldview of science and is often dismissed as bad data.

That said, there is always the possibility that phenomena occur for which we do not have sufficient evidence, because we are not investing enough time, energy, and resources to study them. Even pioneering scientists have pointed out that science advances most dramatically at its extremities—that is, at the edges of current knowledge where the unknown lies. There is thus a tension within science: on one hand, to remain skeptical of questionable or miraculous claims; on the other, to question existing knowledge so science can progress. But because science generally presumes methodological naturalism, explaining natural (physical) phenomena in physical terms, anything associated with subtle matter or spirit is usually rejected. This is the challenge science poses for accepting miracles today.

From the Bhakti tradition’s perspective, miracles are accepted as a possibility because they can arise from two distinct sources: the subtle material domain (mind, mystic powers), and the spiritual domain (God). At the subtle material level, yogis with mystic powers can perform acts considered impossible by today’s standards. Beyond that, the supreme spirit—God—can perform miracles as well.

When miracles occur from the subtle domain, the Bhakti tradition’s overall attitude is not to highlight or get excited about them. The subtle domain is vast and complex, and one can get lost or consumed by its complexities. Yogic or mystic powers involve manipulating matter for one’s own self-centered purposes, which is an extension of the same mentality prevalent in society and science—controlling matter. Technology does this at a physical level; mystic powers do this at a subtler level.

For example, yogis are said to have “Prapti Sudhi,” the ability to manifest a delicious fruit from a distant land just by stretching out their hand, which might seem miraculous. Today, we can order such things online, and although not instantaneous, can receive them within hours or days. So what was inconceivable centuries ago is more accessible today through technology. This illustrates how controlling matter, whether through yogic powers or technology, satisfies self-centered desires but does not inherently lead to spiritual growth.

Because miracles—defined as phenomena unexplainable by normal means—can be very distracting, the Bhakti tradition generally downplays them. They can become titillating distractions from the spiritual path, similar to how modern technology and entertainment can hook people and distract them from higher pursuits.

On the other hand, miracles from the spiritual domain, such as Krishna’s lifting of Govardhan Hill, are definitely celebrated in the Bhakti tradition. However, especially in the Gaudiya Vaishnav tradition, the focus is more on relishing God’s sweetness than on establishing God’s greatness. Krishna’s miracles are thus downplayed as spectacular feats and emphasized more for the loving exchanges they inspire. For example, Krishna’s miraculous acts are embedded within intimate pastimes filled with sweetness and love, such as his dancing with the Gopis or liberating beings from bondage despite being tied himself.

The emphasis is not on the miraculous act alone, but on the loving relationships and sweetness that flow from those acts. Miracles are part of the narrative but not the central highlight. This approach prevents people from being attracted merely to miraculous power, which could lead to blind faith or sentimentalism, rather than a genuine philosophical conviction.

People attracted primarily by miracles may demand further miraculous displays to remain interested, thus being distracted from loving Krishna for his sweetness rather than for his powers. This is why miracles are downplayed even within Bhakti.

Still, miracles can be used in Bhakti if done wisely—by recognizing who can be helped by them. Often miracles are used to prove the divinity of a teacher or deity and inspire faith, but that faith can be sentimental or blind and not philosophical. If miracles or paranormal phenomena can be empirically documented and rationally explained, then they may be seen as supernatural phenomena that expand the boundaries of conventional knowledge (such as science). This empirical and rational approach can open minds to realities beyond the physical domain, encouraging a holistic worldview that includes subtle material and spiritual realities, including Krishna’s supreme divinity.

Examples include phenomena like out-of-body experiences, near-death experiences, past life memories, and extrasensory perceptions (psi). While many claims are dubious, some might be empirically demonstrable beyond reasonable doubt, warranting theoretical explanations aligned with a Vedic worldview. This can help people appreciate a broader reality in a philosophical, not sentimental, way.

To summarize: miracles are phenomena that cannot currently be explained. Science’s methodological naturalism leads it to seek physical explanations and to reject miracles with skepticism. From the Vedic perspective, phenomena from subtle and spiritual domains can occur beyond physical explanations.

Miracles involving manipulation of subtle matter (as yogis do) are accepted but downplayed because their purpose is often material control, not spiritual growth. Miracles performed by Krishna are celebrated but emphasized mainly for the loving exchanges they foster rather than as demonstrations of power.

Overemphasis on miracles risks attracting sentimentalism and blind faith, distracting from the core Bhakti principle of loving Krishna for his sweetness. However, scientifically rigorous investigation of paranormal phenomena may help expand knowledge and open minds to higher realities, supporting a holistic devotional worldview.

Thank you.

Disclaimer: This transcript was generated using AI and may contain occasional errors or inaccuracies.

What is the role of miracles in Bhakti? Why are they downplayed in the Bhakti tradition and can they be used in Bhakti? Answer, it is a very important question. And let us consider miracles from perspective of what they are, what are their negative ramifications and what are their positive possibilities. In general, the word miracle is used for anything that is unexplainable.

So for a child who does not know chemistry, say two chemicals being mixed together and suddenly changing their color from, changing their color to something dramatically different might seem to be a miracle. So basically, anything that is unexplainable by our current knowledge systems or current understanding is often called as a miracle. So in today's world, which is largely dominated by the scientific ethos, there is a considerable level of skepticism about miracles, that these are unlikely, they are improbable.

And the weight of evidence is often used to dismiss even evidence of miracles as bad data. The principle is that extraordinary evidence, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. So of course, there is always the possibility of people being gullible and people being deceived.

In general, belief in miracles today is considered to be a sign of gullibility and there is a high level of skepticism. Of course, because science is focused on the physical domain, what it calls as natural, but from the perspective of Vedic ontology, where there are three levels of reality, that the physical, the mental or subtle, the physical, the subtle material or mental and the spiritual. So anything that goes beyond the physical is not explainable within the worldview of science and is often dismissed as bad data.

Having said that, there is always possibilities that things could be happening for which we do not have sufficient evidence because we are not investing sufficient amount of time, energy and resources for studying. So even pioneering scientists have pointed out that science always advances at its extremities. That means that which is not knowable in today's world, that which is at the extreme of the current scientific conceptions of knowledge is where science's most dramatic advancements take place.

So there is a tension within science at one level to be skeptical so that questions toward questionable or miraculous claims, at the same time to question the data of the mainstream bodies of knowledge so that science advances. But in general, because science has an overarching presumption of methodological naturalism where natural phenomena, that means physical phenomena are explained in physical terms, so anything associated with subtle matter and what to speak of spirit is generally rejected. So that's the challenge about miracles in today's world, with accepting miracles.

Now from the Bhakti tradition's perspective, the possibility of miracles is very much there, it is accepted because miracles can come from, at one level, two distinct sources. One is the level of subtle matter, the mind, and the second is the level of spirit. So at the level of subtle matter, there are yogis with mystic powers and there are various mystic powers described in the broad Vedic tradition, especially the yogic traditions, where they can do things which would be considered impossible for today's world.

And beyond that, at the level of spirit, we souls as spiritual beings are finite, but there is the supreme spirit, the infinite being God, and he can do miracles. So in both these cases, when miracles do occur, the Bhakti tradition's overall attitude is that the first category of miracles are something which are not to be highlighted or to get excited about, because the subtle domain is itself a vast unexplored domain where one can get lost, and can get consumed by its complexities and its subtleties, as the very name suggests. So yogic powers or mystic powers associated with the subtle material domain may enable us to better manipulate matter, but such manipulation will not really lead to much growth, much advancement, because the idea is, it is basically a continuation of the same mentality to control matter for one's own self-centered purposes that is present within people in today's society, and which is present even within scientists, especially technologists.

So what technology does by learning the mechanisms that govern gross matter, mystic powers do the same thing by using subtler technologies. So there is Prapti Siddhi, which say, yogis can, yogis are said to have this, have the ability to get, say, a delicious date from Kabul by stretching their hand or something like that while they are in India. Today we might use Amazon and press some buttons on our phone and we may get, it may not be just as fast, but we may get it within a few hours or a day.

So it is not exactly similar, but it is somewhat similar. What would have been inconceivable for people a few decades and certainly a few centuries ago, that is possible today. Certainly we can summon information, not physical commodities, we can summon information from any part of the world by just pressing a few buttons on our phone.

So in that sense, because the overall principle and purpose is controlling matter, in mystic powers is controlling matter so that we can fulfill our own self-centered desires without necessarily having any spiritual, anything intrinsically, any spiritual purpose to it, or even a spiritual understanding to it. The miracles, basically that which is not explainable by normal systems of knowledge or normal means of understanding, that is downplayed in the bhakti tradition. Because it can be a, it doesn't really lead to spiritual growth and it can be a very titillating way of distraction from the spiritual.

Just like nowadays, kids and even sometimes teenagers and adults get hooked to video games and hooked to phones because just with one phone by pressing a few buttons they can do so many things or so it seems. So similarly, technology can, similarly, miracles can also distract people. That's why miracles are generally downplayed, don't get excited about them.

That's the overall idea. Now as far as the miracles that come from the spiritual domain, that means come from the Supreme Spirit Krishna, they are celebrated in the bhakti tradition. Say for example, Krishna's lifting Govardhan Hill is a miracle.

It is definitely celebrated. But at the same time, especially in the Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition, where the focus is more on relishing God's sweetness rather than on establishing God's greatness so much. So the miracles again are downplayed.

That yes, Krishna, there's nothing, Prabhupada often says in Krishna books, there's nothing wonderful about Krishna doing such things. But what is wonderful is that not the Krishna lifted Govardhan, but under Govardhan there was such sweet loving reciprocations going on between Krishna and the Vrajavasis. So because of our tradition's focus on relishing the personal dimensions of Krishna's divinity and not just his divinity itself, the sweetness of his divinity rather than his greatness.

So the fact that he performs miracles is not a matter of elaborate exposition. So that Krishna expands with the gopis to dance with each of them is miraculous. And it's a part of his very intimate, exalted pastimes.

But at the same time, the focus is on the sweet loving exchanges between Krishna and the gopis, the gopigeet, the songs composed by the gopis, the conversations between them. Even in Krishna, in the Damodar Leela, while Krishna does something miraculous in bringing down the huge trees and releasing between huge trees despite himself being bound. So that is a miracle.

Where does he get such strength from? But rather than focus on the aspect of Krishna brought those trees down, the fact that the Nallakur and Manigrihu were released and they were, they offered prayers and Krishna liberated them from material existence. And before that, Krishna was tied by his mother. And how despite being tied, he still had his powers, enough power to liberate somebody else who was tied in material existence.

That is the emphasis. So that means the miracles are not the singular points of highlight. Miracles are parts of a narrative in which loving exchanges are prominent.

And those loving exchanges are what exudes sweetness, which is the focus of our tradition. So overall, that's why even in the bhakti tradition, miracles are, in our bhakti tradition, miracles are downplayed. And of course, there's one more reason is that there can be the sahajiyism or sentimentalism coming in, that somebody might.

So overall, the important thing is to avoid people getting consumed by sentimental things. Oh, this person did miracle and therefore they must be great. Those attracted by miracles will require to see further miracles to stay on.

And they will not be attracted to Krishna's sweetness. They may just want further demonstrations of Krishna's greatness. So the miraculous aspect in the Bhagavad Gita is Krishna displaying the Vishwaroopa.

And the Vishwaroopa, the universal form, is not the particular highlight, is not hugely highlighted in the commentaries in the Bhagavad Gita, in our tradition, in the bhakti tradition in general. Definitely important, but far more important is the message of love that comes at the end of the Gita and loving surrender that Arjuna exhibits. So people who are non-philosophical, people who are sentimental may be captivated by miracles, but they will continue to look for miracles in future.

And that's how they may be distracted from the core principle of loving Krishna. For his sweetness, not for his capacity to perform miracles, but for his, so that kind of distraction is avoided, is to be avoided. So having said this, still there is potential for miracles to be used in bhakti.

And the best way to do so is by recognizing who can be helped by it, instead of generally miracles are used to prove the divinity of a particular teacher or a particular deity, and to inspire faith. Often that faith is sentimental or even blind. It's usually non-philosophical.

So that way it can't be used. But what are considered miracles as in terms of phenomena not explainable by current paradigms of knowledge? If they can be empirically documented or demonstrated, and then they can be rationally explained, then these are often called as supernatural phenomena rather than miracles. Then these can expand the boundaries of knowledge of conventional knowledge systems.

By conventional I mean science. So for that purpose miracles can definitely be utilized, what are called as miracles. So even out-of-body experiences, near-death experiences, past life memories, or remote viewing, or in general what we can call as PSI, extrasensory perceptions, these are often considered dubious.

And yes, many of the claims may be dubious. But there are some or there could be some claims which could be demonstrable empirically with a beyond reasonable doubt. And then if the evidence is established, then a theoretical explanation will be required, will be called for.

And that explanation will imply, will make us turn toward something higher in our lives, will open the minds that there is something beyond the physical domain. And then thus we can expand people's minds, not in a sentimental gullible sense, but in a, but through empirical rational methods. And this would be a philosophical approach that can help people open themselves to a worldview that explains reality more holistically, and that an explanation, a worldview that includes divinity, including especially the supremely sweet divinity Krishna.

So that's where miracles can be utilized in devotional service. And miracles, some people being able to do miracles to build faith in others by their individual accomplishments are also possible to use. But if at all people have those miraculous powers, but that can often be distracting.

So that is downplayed. But especially the expanding the conceptions of knowledge of the paradigms of science, that was something which miracles could be used to do to open people's minds to higher realities. So to summarize, things that can't be explained are what we call as miraculous.

And because science works with methodological naturalism, it seeks physical explanations for physical phenomena. So miracles are often treated with severe skepticism and are usually rejected, that even when evidence is presented, great evidence, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, that is the parameter that is used. From the Vedic traditions, from the broad Vedic traditions perspective, the subtle material domain and the spiritual domains, and both could be the source of phenomena that may not be explainable by, at the level of physical reality.

So miracles coming from being able to manipulate the subtle material domain to bring about changes in the gross material domain, as yogis do, can be used. They are accepted, their existence is accepted within the Bhakti tradition, but because the underlying mentality is usually to demonstrate control over material nature, not necessarily to connect with the divine further, to grow spiritually, they are acknowledged but downplayed, such miracles. As titillating distractions, just like technology can become a huge distraction, then the miracles that Krishna can perform are acknowledged and to some extent celebrated also, but even they are downplayed to demonstrations of Krishna's sweetness, because that is the particular emphasis of our Bhakti tradition, the Gaudiya tradition.

And if they were overplayed, over-emphasized, that might attract people who are sentimental or sahajaic, and it might trigger blind faith, not a philosophical conviction about the expansive nature of reality. Therefore, but what we could do in current times is, if there can be a greater research into paranormal phenomena, which are documented empirically with rigor, and then explained rationally using the Vedic worldview, then definitely people can become open to realities beyond the physical and thus draw, be more receptive to a holistic worldview that includes both subtle material and spiritual realities, including the supreme divinity Krishna. Thank you.