Why do you fellas have a problem with evolution? What will you do when genetic cures become the norm?

From Sunil

Transcript

This is an AI-generated transcript and may contain some errors.
thank you question from Sunil siru why do you fellows have problem with evolution what will you do when genetic cures become the norm answer it is not that we have problems with evolution theory of evolution itself has its own big problems and we are simply pointing that out to those who have unnecessary faith in it so the problem with theory of evolution is that it is a theory whose supporting evidence is so flimsy that actually if it had just been for its theoretical power it would have been entirely unfit to survive it would have died long ago the only reason that evolution is surviving as a scientific theory is because all the atheists in the world are using all their combined intelligence to put this theory on artificial ventilation and somehow trying to prolong its existence it is one of the from the evidence point of view one of the flimsiest based evidence theories and entirely unfit to survive and there are hundreds of books written not just by scientists with religious or ideological motives but scientists who are secular scientists who have objectively studied the theory who have no previous ideological preconceptions and they have pointed out how the theoretical basis of evolution as well as its evidential basis is conspicuously spectacularly missing so for example you can read David Berlinski’s writings on evolution you can consider the book Fairy Tales of Evolution and this is a technical subject so evolution has its own problems and as devotees we have got nothing to do against any scientific theory our focus is on being devoted to God so if science is abused by atheists to impose atheism on the masses then that is something which we definitely object to and as far as genetic cure is concerned actually this is called a red herring that we give one evidence, say for example there is an ancient fossil debris an ancient fossil or a debris of an ancient civilization and one fragment of one brick there is red and from that one concludes that the whole city was made using red bricks so this is unwarranted or unscientific extrapolation of scientific observations so practically the whole theory of evolution is nothing but unscientific extrapolation of scientific observations so micro evolution is a fact of nature that means nature responds to changes, oppositions opposing forces by adapting itself however these adaptations whether they are caused by external factors or by internal genetic mutations they are limited and they are within a species, they do not cross the boundaries of species and that’s why genetic cures actually do not do anything to substantiate the theory of evolution, micro evolution is a fact of nature and micro evolution does nothing to prove macro evolution so what is the claim of the theory of evolution is that all species have come from some unicellular organism which ultimately have come from matter and this involves not just minor variation within species but major variations across species and there is leave alone any evidence for this, there is not even a reasonably satisfying theoretical mechanism of how it could have happened leave alone anyone demonstrating it happened and leave alone anyone providing any evidence in the fossils for that happening so therefore evolution has its own big problems and these sort of false evidences which are not evidences for evolution, which are simply evidences for facts in nature genetic cures are basically based on the broad principles of micro evolution wherein there are natural variations and there are further simulated variations which can be made based on our own based on our own research but these are ultimately at a micro level, these do not prove macro evolution and even if genetic cures become the norm that does nothing to prove the theory of evolution thank you