You said if we do whatever we like we end up disliking ourselves – isn’t varnashrama based on working according to our likings?
Is the higher taste of bhakti available only for those who practice bhakti exclusively while living in a temple?
If everything is under karma are terrorists wrongdoers or simply instruments for punishing wrongdoers?
Wasn’t Arjuna passionate about archery – can we be passionate about something and still be devotional?
When India is the land of spirituality why was it overrun by so many invaders – why does it still have a colonial mentality?
If we can do a service well and see others doing that service poorly, should we stay uninvolved to avoid becoming proud or critical?
When our acharyas wanted an institution, how can we deal with people’s aversion to religious institutions?
If others do politics to sideline us from our service, should we also do politics to continue our service?
In the computer metaphor for explaining the self, comparing the soul with the user mixes the inanimate with the animate – isn’t it better to compare consciousness with electricity?
Duryodhana felt no moral compunction while persecuting the Pandavas, but Dhirtrashtra did – why the difference?
The soul has knowledge that is presently covered – does this mean the soul knows exact scriptural verses?
When the mind becomes a mirror for the pure soul, does the soul perceive itself through the mind or without it too?
By contemplating the consequences of sensuality, if we practice bhakti, is that bhakti at the level of fear?
How can we balance our limited controllership over our children with our responsibility to guide them?